In the "For All Mankind" timeline, NASA would develop the moon base and the space shuttle and then, instead of trying to invent a whole new vehicle, modified the orbiters so they could support the activities on the lunar surface. "Thinking back to the evolution in the real history of the program, NASA comes to the Nixon administration and says 'What's after Apollo? Well, here's the big plan: the moon base, space stations, go to Mars, the space shuttle, and Nixon kind of goes, uh, how about just the shuttle?' And so it felt like in our version that existing plan was still kind of there when the Russians grab the moon at the last minute," said Moore. Moore found his justification in the shuttle's actual history. It's not free, but it's a significant savings in terms of the production budget." But if I can figure out a way to justify the use of the shuttle, it's going to help me a lot. Suddenly I won't have as much money for a lot of other things. Suddenly I won't have as much money to build a moon base. "So, in just a dollars and cents, producer part of me, it was like, if I give that up, I'm going to have to cut back on a lot of other things. There is an existing set that replicates the interior cockpit of the space shuttle. "There would be no clips that I could use. "If we didn't use the shuttle and we had to create a whole new vehicle for travel, it was going to cost me a lot more," said Moore. The space shuttle might have refueled while docked with Skylab as shown in the second season of "For All Mankind." (Image credit: Apple TV+)īut there was also a practical reason to use the space shuttle. "When the story had to trump the physics, they always gave me the chance to at least put in a little 'fig leaf,' and if you listen really carefully, there's one line of dialogue in episode nine of season two where we do explain how the shuttle might have been able to get to the moon," Reisman said. But if there is something that feels really important to the story, the story is going to win," he said. "The great thing about 'For All Mankind' is that they do try to get as much of the technical stuff as accurate as they can. "We even did calculations that showed if you filled up the payload bay with hydrazine and fed it to the OMS engines, you still couldn't get to the moon and back without exceeding the payload mass of the orbiter."īut Reisman also knew that if they were going to overlook that, they had a good reason. It had nowhere near enough delta-v," he said, referring to a change in velocity. "We all pointed out that the shuttle could never actually get to the moon. Reisman, who made a cameo appearance as the commander of the space shuttle Columbia on its way back from the moon, has served as a technical advisor for the series from its start. ![]() ![]() "Okay, so we know it can't," Garrett Reisman, a former NASA astronaut who flew on the space shuttle, admitted in an interview with. Space shuttle Columbia heads back to Earth from the moon in the second season of Apple TV+'s "For All Mankind." (Image credit: Apple TV+) A little fig leaf
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |